CEBP Meeting Calendar Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merzenich, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jöckel, K.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merzenich, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jöckel, K.-H.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 10, 515-522, May 2001
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research

Biomonitoring on Carcinogenic Metals and Oxidative DNA Damage in a Cross-Sectional Study1

Hiltrud Merzenich2, Andrea Hartwig, Wolfgang Ahrens, Detmar Beyersmann, Regina Schlepegrell, Martin Scholze, Jürgen Timm and Karl-Heinz Jöckel

Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine and Centre for Public Health, [H. M., W. A.], Departments of Biology and Chemistry [D. B., A. H., R. S.] and Mathematics [M. S., J. T.], University of Bremen, D-28359 Bremen; University of Karlsruhe, Institute of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, D-76128 Karlsruhe [A. H.]; and Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Essen and West German Tumor Center Essen, D-45122 Essen [K-H. J., W. A.], Germany


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Oxidative DNA damage is mediated by reactive oxygen species and is supposed to play an important role in various diseases including cancer. The endogenous amount of reactive oxygen species may be enhanced by the exposure to genotoxic metals. A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1993 to 1994 in an urban population in Germany to investigate the association between metal exposure and oxidative DNA damage.

The cross-sectional sample of 824 participants was recruited from the registry of residents in Bremen, comprising about two-third males and one-third females with an average age of 61.1 years. A standardized questionnaire was used to obtain the occupational and smoking history. The incorporated dose of exposure to metals was assessed by biological monitoring. Chromium, cadmium, and nickel were measured in 593 urine samples. Lead was determined in blood samples of 227 participants. As a biomarker for oxidative DNA damage, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine has been analyzed in lymphocytes of 201 participants. Oxidative lesions were identified by single strand breaks induced by the bacterial formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) in combination with the alkaline unwinding approach.

The concentrations of metals indicate a low body load (median values: 1.0 µg nickel/l urine, 0.4 µg cadmium/l urine, and 46 µg lead/l blood; 83% of chromium measures were below the technical detection limit of 0.3 µg/l). The median level of Fpg-sensitive DNA lesions was 0.23 lesions/106 bp. A positive association between nickel and the rate of oxidative DNA lesions (Fpg-sensitive sites) was observed (odds ratio, 2.15; tertiles 1 versus 3, P < 0.05), which provides further evidence for the genotoxic effect of nickel in the general population.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pollution of the environment and human exposure to metals occur as a result of natural erosion of metal-containing minerals and as a result of human activities such as mining, smelting, fossil fuel combustion, and industrial application of metals. The highest exposure usually occurs at the work place. In addition, metal compounds in the general environment can be solubilized in water and become available for uptake by vegetation and consumption by animals. Hence, significant exposure may occur through food, beverages, and drinking water. Air pollution is another common exposure route. For smokers, smoking is the major source of cadmium exposure, because tobacco contains significant amounts of cadmium vaporized by the high temperature of the glow. Metals are accumulated in compartments of the body. Excretion may take years or decades (1 , 2) .

Metals interfere with many cellular reactions. The carcinogenic potential of cadmium, nickel, and chromium compounds is well established for humans and experimental animals (3 , 4) . Regarding lead, the epidemiological data are not conclusive with respect to human carcinogenicity, but carcinogenic and cocarcinogenic effects of lead compounds have been demonstrated in experimental animals (5 , 6) . However, the molecular interactions leading to tumor formation after exposure to metals are still not well understood. One mechanism proposed frequently is an increase in oxidative DNA lesions attributable to metal exposure, mediated either by an increased generation of highly reactive oxygen species and/or by interference with DNA repair processes (7, 8, 9, 10) .

Oxidative DNA lesions are supposed to play an important role in various diseases including cancer and premature aging (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) . Among the diverse oxidative DNA lesions 8-oxo-Gua3 is one of the most frequent base modifications and has attracted special attention because it is premutagenic, causing G to T transversions. Thus, 8-oxo-Gua is regarded as a suitable biomarker of oxidative stress (16 , 17) .

The main objective of this study was to quantify the level of oxidative DNA damage in a human study population and to investigate possible associations between the incorporated concentrations of cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead and the rate of oxidative DNA lesions in lymphocytes. In the present study, we investigated the level of oxidative DNA base modifications in lymphocytes of 201 participants of a cross-sectional study in Bremen, Germany. We applied a method developed recently in our laboratory, which thus far has been used mainly to quantify oxidative DNA lesions in cultured mammalian cells (18) .


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Population and Data Collection.
The survey was conducted between 1993 and 1994 with a randomly selected cross-section of inhabitants of Bremen. The study population comprised a total of 824 participants. The sample was drawn from the compulsory municipality registry of residents. All German residents of the city of Bremen in the age range 35–80 years were eligible. The response proportion was ~61% for interview (49% interviews conducted, 29% refusals, 3% no contact, 11% not traceable, and 9% too ill for interview). The cross-sectional sample was set up as a second control group for a case-control-study on lung cancer risk (19) . The age and sex distribution of this cross-sectional survey was determined by the distribution of the completed case-control-study, including 592 men and 232 women. The average age was 61.1 years.

The study participants were interviewed by trained interviewers. A structured questionnaire was used in personal interviews to obtain information on all jobs held after school, smoking history, a food-frequency questionnaire, and basic demographic characteristics. Job-specific supplementary questionnaires were used to obtain detailed information on occupational exposure.

In addition, a medical examination of participants was performed at the study center. The medical examination was offered to participants as a health check-up and comprised the measurement of blood pressure, body height, body weight, and the analysis of blood and urine. From 824 interviewed persons, a total of 62% (n = 491) participated in the medical examination.

The participation in such a health check-up might indicate a higher prevalence of better education, higher socio-economic status, and/or improved health consciousness. To investigate the possibility of a selection bias, smoking status, highest school education, and vocational training were compared between responders and nonresponders to the medical examination. The data do not show substantial differences (Table 1)Citation . No statistically significant age difference could be detected (average age of male participants versus nonparticipants, 60.4 versus 61.9 years; average age of female participants versus nonparticipants, 59.7 versus 63.7 years).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Distribution of smoking, school education, and vocational training for responders and nonresponders of the medical examination

 
Analysis of the Concentrations of Metals in Blood and Urine Samples.
A total of 593 urine samples, most of them morning urine, had been collected during the medical examination in the study center or subsequently at the interview at the participants’ home. The collected urine samples were analyzed to assess the concentrations of chromium, cadmium, and nickel. In addition, the concentration of creatinine was measured in urine samples to account for dilution effects. All sampling materials, analytical glass, and plasticware purchased were of low-metal grade and were further cleaned with diluted Suprapur nitric acid before use. Lead was analyzed in 227 blood samples.

Nickel, chromium, and lead were determined by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Chromium was analyzed by the method of Minoia et al. (20) , lead was determined according to Shuttler and Delves (21) , and nickel was analyzed as described by Henschler and Greim (22) .

Monitoring of Oxidative DNA Damage in Lymphocytes.
Because the laboratory could process only a limited number of specimens each day, blood sample analyses from at most 10 participants equivalent to 40 analytical samples per study day could be carried out. Because of these technical restrictions, the blood samples of 201 participants, who were examined in the morning hours, have been considered for DNA analysis. Blood was drawn by trained personnel into heparinized syringes and stored at room temperature until analyzed. Lymphocytes were isolated within 5 h after blood withdrawal. Samples were analyzed twice, each with and without Fpg incubation. Hence, four analytical approaches were conducted for each collected blood sample.

There was no significant difference between the participants with DNA analysis versus participants without DNA analysis regarding sociodemographic variables, smoking habits, and incorporated metal exposure (data not shown). However, the male participants in the DNA sample are, on average, 2 years older compared with the non-DNA sample. There were no age-related differences for women.

Oxidative DNA modifications in lymphocytes were monitored by their sensitivity toward the bacterial Fpg. This damage-specific repair enzyme excises 8-oxo-Gua as well as ring-opened forms of guanine and adenine, and the resulting abasic sites are converted into DNA single strand breaks by the associated endonuclease activity into single DNA strand breaks (23) . To quantify Fpg-sensitive sites in human lymphocytes, we adapted a procedure originally established in our laboratory for the detection of Fpg-sensitive sites in cultured mammalian cells (24) . The principle of the applied method is shown in Fig. 1Citation . Human lymphocytes are isolated from whole blood and gently lysed with Triton X-100; subsequently, histones are removed by high salt treatment. This treatment generates nucleoids where the DNA is assessable to enzymatic attack because of the depletion of most nuclear proteins. The subsequent incubation with the Fpg protein specifically introduces DNA strand breaks at the sites of 8-oxo-Gua and some other forms of ring-opened purines as described above by the glycosylase and associated endonuclease activity. These DNA strand breaks are detected and quantified by the alkaline unwinding method. The DNA is allowed to unwind at pH 12.3 for 30 min at room temperature in the dark; the unwinding is stopped by neutralization and sonication. Single- and double-stranded DNA are separated on small hydroxyapatite columns, and the respective amounts are quantified fluorimetrically by the addition of the fluorescence dye Hoechst 33258.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. The detection of Fpg-sensitive sites in human lymphocytes.

 
To quantitate the frequency of Fpg-sensitive sites, the fraction of double-stranded DNA was correlated with the amount of DNA strand breaks by calibration with X-rays using a 200 keV X-ray source at a dose-rate of 4 Gy/min with an additional 0.5-mm copper filter (Siemens). Lymphocytes covered with RPMI 1640 were irradiated on ice with different doses of X-rays (0–50 Gy). Subsequently, the lysis and further procedure were carried out as described above, but omitting the Fpg protein. According to Föhe and Dikomey (25) , the decrease in double-stranded DNA after irradiation with increasing doses of X-rays is described by the formula , where F is the fraction of double-stranded DNA of irradiated cells, F0 is the fraction of double-stranded DNA of unirradiated control cells, c represents the slope of the calibration curve, and D is the dose applied in Gy. c was determined to be 0.06 on the conditions applied. On the basis of a number of 103 DNA strand breaks per Gy and cell (26, 27, 28) , the number of enzyme-sensitive sites and/or DNA strand breaks per cell induced by the DNA-damaging agents was calculated by the following equation:

The whole procedure has been optimized with respect to incubation conditions with the Fpg protein (salt concentration, Fpg concentration, and incubation time, ensuring optimal detection of Fpg-sensitive sites).

Quality Criteria for the Monitoring of Oxidative DNA Damage in Lymphocytes.
Because the application of this method for lymphocytes was new and had never been applied in an epidemiological study before, double determinations of Fpg-sensitive sites in lymphocytes have been conducted for each participant to obtain a measure of the reproducibility of the test system. Because the analyses have been conducted in groups of 9–11 participants during an entire time period of 2 years and the correct calculation of Fpg-sensitive sites depends on the exact alkaline unwinding conditions on each study day, HeLa cells were analyzed in parallel. HeLa cells should show at least 60% control values for double-stranded DNA. Only lymphocyte samples from those days have been considered for statistical evaluation where HeLa cells exerted control values of 60% and higher. Because of this criterion, 1 set of 10 samples has been excluded. In addition, only those samples were included where both analytical values did not differ by >15%. This rigid quality criterion led to the exclusion of 50 more samples, leaving 141 samples (70.2%) for further statistical calculations.

Statistical Analysis.
To investigate the relationship between the rate of DNA lesions and incorporated exposure to metals we used both the linear and logistic regression analysis. The model parameter was estimated using the ordinary least-squares criterion. The necessary model assumptions of constancy of error variance and symmetry of distribution of the dependent variable (oxidative DNA lesions) for the linear regression were achieved by a nonlinear Box-Cox transformation (29) . This parametric transformation works with two unknown parameters ({lambda}1 and {lambda}2) and is formulated by:

The shift parameter {lambda}2 was a priori defined as the 1% percentile of the untransformed distribution plus 1. The second parameter {lambda}1 was estimated by the maximum likelihood method. The proportion of variance of the oxidative DNA lesions that can be explained by the regressor variables (confounder and metal concentration) was determined by the R2 criterion within the linear regression analysis (30) .

For the logistic regression analysis, we transformed all values of the oxidative DNA lesions into a binary response (0, low oxidative DNA lesions; 1, high oxidative DNA lesions), using percentiles of the distribution as cutoff points. This was done in different ways, resulting in three different regression models:

model I, rate of DNA lesions below the median vs. above the median; model II, rate of DNA lesions for tertiles <1 versus >3; and model III, rate of DNA lesions for quartiles <1 versus 4. The odds ratios as well as the model parameters were fitted by the method of maximum likelihood; the corresponding confidence intervals were determined by the profile likelihood function.

To exclude possible masking effects caused by personal or external factors (confounding), we included in every linear and logistic regression analysis some additional covariables: age, sex, occupational exposure to X-ray exposure, and two correction terms adjusting for external seasonal influences. Ionizing radiation was a priori seen as a potential confounder for oxidative DNA damage. The two correction terms concerning external seasonal influences were not significantly correlated with other covariables or metal concentration and thus included in the regression models. The statistical computer program SAS (31) was used for all calculations.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Incorporated Exposure to Metals of the Study Population.
The cadmium level measured in urine samples shows a median value of 0.40 and 0.50 µg/l and a maximum value of 3.80 and 5.05 µg/l for women and men, respectively (Table 2)Citation . Higher cadmium levels are found in males, presumably because of the higher proportion of smokers and exsmokers in male participants (data not shown). Smokers show an average concentration of 0.60 µg/l, whereas nonsmokers excrete 0.40 µg cadmium/l. Volume-related nickel concentrations in urine samples ranged from 0.4 µg/l to 17.05 µg/l urine with a median of 1.0 µg/l for both sexes. No significant differences related to smoking habits could be detected. Compared with results obtained in an occupation–exposed population, the measured nickel concentration in urine was low (32) . The median lead level in whole blood was 46.0 µg/l for both sexes, ranging from 20 to 156 µg/l. About 80% of all chromium measurements are below the detection limit (0.3 µg/l urine).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2 Concentrations of metals in the study population

 
Table 3Citation depicts the metal concentrations for the subsample with DNA analysis. No statistically significant differences could be detected compared with the results for the whole study group. According to the threshold limit values (33) , only 7% (n = 10) of the subsample were at a high-level exposure for at least one of the metals of interest at the time of data collection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3 Concentrations of metals in participants with DNA measurements

 
Level of Fpg-sensitive Sites.
In Fig. 2Citation , the rate of Fpg-sensitive sites is depicted in categories of 1000 lesions/cell. We observed a median level of 1375 lesions/cell or 0.23 lesions/106 bp, with lesion frequencies ranging from not detectable to 2.7 lesions/106 bp. The respective quantile values are listed in Table 4Citation .



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. Distribution of the frequency of Fpg-sensitive DNA lesions in the study group.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 4 Quantile values of Fpg-sensitive DNA lesions

 
According to published data, the frequencies for Fpg-sensitive sites for cultured mammalian cells as well as for human lymphocytes are usually between 0.1 and 0.4/106 bp (Table 5)Citation , which is in good agreement with the data obtained in this epidemiological study. However, the values reported for 8-oxo-Gua determined by HPLC/ECD are usually one order of magnitude higher, and those determined by GC/MS are at least two orders of magnitude higher (Table 6)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 5 Levels of Fpg-sensitive DNA lesions in human lymphocytes derived from different analytical procedures

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 6 Examples for steady-state levelsa of 8-oxo-dG or 8-oxo-G in human lymphocytes/leukocytes determined by HPLC/ECDb and GC/MSc

 
Determinants for Oxidative DNA Damage.
The data provide no evidence for an association between the level of oxidative DNA lesions (8-oxo-Gua) and age or sex. No association with smoking status or a quantitative dose-response trend for the average amount of cigarettes smoked per day could be detected (data not shown).

Although no statistically significant relation was found between the concentrations of cadmium, chromium, lead, and oxidative DNA damage, an association exists between the nickel concentration measured in urine samples (adjusted for creatinine) and the amount of oxidative DNA lesions in lymphocytes (Table 7)Citation . This effect is confirmed by the logistic regression analysis (Table 8)Citation . The increasing ORs from model 1 to model 3 suggest a dose-response relationship between the nickel concentration and frequency of oxidative DNA lesions. If those 60 samples were included in the statistical analyses that were excluded because of the quality criteria (tertiles 1 versus 3; OR, 1.74; confidence limits, 1.0–2.66) the conclusions of the study would not change substantially.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 7 Multivariate linear regression model between the rate of oxidative DNA damage and the incorporated concentration of cadmium, nickel, chromium, and lead (n = 136)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 8 Logistic regression models: Odds ratios for Fpg-sensitive DNA lesions related to nickel (Ni/g creatinine) in urine with 95% confidence limits

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Level of Fpg-sensitive Lesions in DNA of Human Blood Lymphocytes.
The values for Fpg-sensitive sites in the present study range from not detectable to 2.7 lesions/106 bp. A wide range of different values for the extent of endogenous oxidative DNA damage has been published during the last years. When comparing the frequencies of Fpg-sensitive sites obtained in the present study with other studies measuring Fpg-sensitive sites in human lymphocytes, they are of the same order of magnitude (Table 5)Citation . On the other hand, the values are considerably lower as compared with the amount of 8-oxo-Gua detected by HPLC/ECD or GC/MS (Table 6)Citation . This raises the question as to which estimate resembles the "true" frequency of oxidative DNA damage. There are several indications that the frequency of 8-oxo-Gua might be overestimated by both HPLC and GC/MS. Oxidative DNA damage might be introduced unintentionally during the DNA isolation and digestion procedure. In support of this point, special precautions during sample preparation for HPLC analysis applied by several groups have led to a pronounced decrease in levels published during the last years (Table 6)Citation , reaching values close to the frequency of Fpg-sensitive sites (34) . Furthermore, the derivatization reaction conducted for the determination of 8-hydroxyguanine by GC/MS may lead to an artifactual generation of 8-oxo-G, which might explain the even higher background levels observed by GC/MS as compared with HPLC with ECD (35) . Thus, one important advantage of the procedure applied in the present study is certainly the fact that neither isolation of DNA nor derivatization are needed, and only a few minutes are required from cell lysis until incubation with the Fpg protein (for further discussion, see Ref. 24 ). Therefore, the Fpg-sensitive sites determined in human lymphocytes in this cross-sectional study may provide an important estimate of the level of oxidative DNA damage. Assuming that the steady-state levels of Fpg-sensitive sites resemble realistic approximations of the degree of oxidative DNA damage in human lymphocytes, the test system is very sensitive with respect to small changes in the extent of oxidative DNA damage. Furthermore, the data supply an important basis to identify prooxidative and protective dietary and environmental factors affecting the extent of oxidative DNA damage. Taken together, the assessment of Fpg-sensitive sites may be a valuable biomarker of oxidative stress.

Determinants of Fpg-sensitive Lesions.
The data provide no evidence for an association between the level of oxidative DNA lesions and age, sex, or smoking habits. Increased oxidative stress induced by tobacco consumption might enhance the endogenous amount of oxidative DNA damage, but published results are not conclusive (36, 37, 38) . One could speculate on an association between age and oxidative DNA damage, because of an age-related decline in DNA repair capacity paralleled by cumulation of exposure through occupation or environment. However, our study population comprised only a small age range, which might impair the detection of an association between age and the amount of DNA lesions.

Concentrations of lead in blood or urine samples are determined by current and/or accumulated exposure. Lymphocytes are readily accessible, and they can take up reactive intermediates from a variety of body tissues with which they come into contact. In our study, no statistically significant relation was found between the concentrations of cadmium, chromium, lead, and the amount of DNA damage in lymphocytes. The lack of correlation between exposure to cadmium and oxidative DNA damage in lymphocytes could be attributable to a low exposure of the study population. Nonsmoking, non-occupationally-exposed individuals have urine levels between 0.1 and 0.7 µg/l (1) . The observed geometric mean of the measured cadmium concentration in our study population shows a value of 0.5 µg/l, indicating a moderate exposure to cadmium. The 90% percentile determined in this study (1.1 µg cadmium/l) is below those cadmium concentrations that indicate a threshold for significant alterations of renal markers in occupationally-exposed individuals (39) .

The median blood lead level was 46.0 µg/l, ranging from 20 to 156 µg/l. The presented values are ~30% lower when compared with measurements of a representative survey conducted in Germany in the beginning of the 1980s (40) , which is probably a result of the successive reduction of leaded gasoline. A low exposure situation or a limited range of exposure could be the reason for the observed lack of association between measured lead concentrations and oxidative DNA damage.

The fact that 83% of chromium measures were below the technical detection limit (0.3 µg/l) might impair the investigation of exposure-effect relationships. Furthermore, lymphocytes might not be a suitable tissue to reflect low level DNA damage occurring after inhalative exposure, because cadmium and chromium compounds accumulate primarily in the kidney and lung.

Nevertheless, the study provides evidence for an association between the nickel concentration measured in urine samples and the amount of oxidative DNA lesions in lymphocytes. Nickel is used in the production of stainless steel, high-nickel alloys, Ni-Cd batteries, and electronic components. A major fraction of nickel absorbed by humans appears to be eliminated relatively quickly, mainly via urine. The biological half-life has been estimated to be between 1 and 2 days. Moderately increased concentrations of nickel have been found in the urine and blood of workers exposed to nickel, even after exposure has long been ceased. Thus, a small fraction of absorbed nickel will accumulate in the body and will be eliminated only slowly (1) .

The positive association between nickel content in urine and DNA lesions in lymphocytes provides further evidence for the genotoxic effects of this metal. The carcinogenicity of nickel has been established. An increased risk for lung cancer has been reported attributable to occupational exposure to nickel compounds (1) . The evidence from human and experimental studies indicates that exposure via the respiratory route to soluble compounds of nickel results in respiratory cancer (2) . Nickel has been shown to inhibit the repair of oxidative DNA lesions (9) . A reduced repair capacity of oxidative DNA damage might enhance the level of the studied lesions in vivo and hence might increase the risk of developing cancer. Because the repair of DNA damage is essential for the prevention of cancers, the inhibition may account for the carcinogenic action of nickel.

However, it should be considered that there might be some uncertainties regarding the assessment of the exposure to nickel and the assessment of the related biological effect. Knowledge of the kinetics of the measured substance in the central plasma compartment, in the elimination compartments, especially urine, and in storage compartments is essential to establish the correct organ site and time for sampling and the number of samples that should be taken. Another critical issue is the persistence of the biological effects of carcinogens in target tissues. Lymphocytes are used frequently for the measurement of oxidative DNA modifications, because they can themselves be possible target cells for carcinogenic agents. Because the lifespan of different lymphocyte subpopulations may vary from a few days to several years and the size of these populations can be influenced by a variety of immunological stimuli, the persistence of DNA lesions in lymphocytes cannot be estimated in general. For future directions, a longitudinal rather than a cross-sectional study should be conducted to ascertain the possible association between nickel exposure and oxidative DNA lesions. A longitudinal study that includes a relevant number of occupationally exposed participants offers an advantage for studying dose-effect relationships over time with repeated measurements.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. J. Dahm-Daphi, Hamburg, Germany, for help in calibrating the alkaline unwinding technique with X-rays. The Fpg protein was a kind gift of Dr. Serge Boiteux, Fontany aux Roses, France. We also thank Ines Pelz for excellent management of the data collection.


   Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 The study was funded by Grant FKZ 07 PHF 02 from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Bremer Institut für Präventionsforschung und Sozialmedizin, Linzer Strasse 8, D-28359 Bremen, Germany. Phone: 49-421-5959-657; Fax: 49-421-3347-268; E-mail: ahrens{at}bips.uni-bremen.de Back

3 The abbreviations used are: 8-oxo-Gua, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine; Fpg, formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase; HPLC/ECD, high-performance liquid chromatography/electrochemical detection; GC/MS, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; OR, odds ratio. Back

Received 6/ 6/00; revised 1/11/01; accepted 3/ 2/01.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Elinder C. G., Friberg L., Kjellström T., Nordberg G., Oberdoerster G. . Biological monitoring of metals. IPCS, International Programme on Chemical Safety, WHO Geneva 1994.
  2. Hayes R. B. The carcinogenicity of metals in humans. Cancer Causes Control, 8: 371-385, 1997.[Medline]
  3. IARC: Chromium, Nickel and Welding. IARC Monographs, Vol. 49. Lyon: IARC, 1990.
  4. IARC: Beryllium, Cadmium, Mercury and Exposures in the Glass Manufacturing Industry. IARC Monographs, Vol. 58. Lyon: IARC, 1993.
  5. Roy N. K., Rossman T. G. Mutagenesis and comutagenesis by lead compounds. Mutat. Res., 298: 97-103, 1992.[Medline]
  6. Cohen M. D., Bowser D. H., Costa M. Carcinogenicity and genotoxicity of lead, beryllium, and other metals Chang L-W. eds. . Toxicology of Metals, : 253-263, Lewis Publishers, CRS Press 1996.
  7. Hartwig A. Recent advances in metal carcinogenicity. Pure Appl. Chem., 72: 1007-1014, 2000.
  8. Kasprzak K. S., Jaruga P., Zastawny T. H., North S. L., Riggs C. W., Olinski R., Dizdaroglu M. Oxidative DNA base damage and its repair in kidneys and livers of nickel(II)-treated male F344 rats. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 18: 271-277, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dally H., Hartwig A. Induction and repair inhibition of oxidative DNA damage by nickel(II) and cadmium(II) in mammalian cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 18: 1021-1026, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kasprzak K. S. The role of oxidative damage in metal carcinogenicity. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 4: 604-615, 1991.[Medline]
  11. Cerutti P. A. Oxy-radicals and cancer. Lancet, 344: 862-863, 1994.[Medline]
  12. Grisham M. B. Oxidants and free radicals in inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet, 344: 859-861, 1994.[Medline]
  13. Jenner P. Oxidative damage in neurodegenerative disease. Lancet, 344: 796-798, 1994.[Medline]
  14. Witztum J. L. The oxidation hypothesis of atherosclerosis. Lancet, 344: 793-795, 1994.[Medline]
  15. Beckman K. B., Ames B. N. The free radical theory of aging matures. Physiol. Rev., 78: 547-581, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Collins A. R. Oxidative DNA damage, antioxidants, and cancer. Bioessays, 21: 238-246, 1999.[Medline]
  17. Wood M. L., Dizdaroglu M., Gajewski E., Essigmann J. M. Mechanistic studies of ionizing radiation and oxidative mutagenesis: genetic effects of a single 8-hydroxyguanine (7-hydro-8-oxoguanine) residue inserted at a unique site in a viral genome. Biochemistry, 29: 7024-7032, 1990.[Medline]
  18. Hartwig A., Dally H., Schlepegrell R. Sensitive analysis of oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells: use of the bacterial Fpg protein in combination with alkaline unwinding. Toxicol. Lett., 88: 85-90, 1996.[Medline]
  19. Jöckel K. H., Ahrens W., Jahn I., Pohlabeln H., Bolm-Audorff U. Occupational risk factors for lung cancer: a case-control study in West Germany. Int. J. Epidemiol., 27: 549-560, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Minoia C., Colli M., Pozzoli L. Determination of hexavalent chromium in urine by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Atomic Spectrosc., 2: 163 1981.
  21. Shuttler I. L., Delves H. T. Determination of lead in blood by atomic absorption spectrometry with electrothermal atomization. Analyst, 111: 651-656, 1986.[Medline]
  22. Henschler D., Greim H. . Analyses of Hazardous Substances in Biological Materials, 177-188, VCH Weinheim 1985.
  23. Boiteux S., Gajewski E., Laval J., Dizdaroglu M. Substrate specificity of the Escherichia coli Fpg protein (formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase): excision of purine lesions in DNA produced by ionizing radiation or photosensitization. Biochemistry, 31: 106-110, 1992.[Medline]
  24. Hartwig A. Assessment of oxidative DNA damage by the frequency of formamidopyrimidine glycosylase (FPG) sensitive DNA lesions Aruoma O. I. Halliwell B. eds. . DNA & Free Radicals: Techniques, Mechanisms & Applications, : 215-223, OICA International, Saint Luca London 1998.
  25. Föhe C., Dikomey E. Induction and repair of DNA base damage studied in X-irradiated CHO cells using the M. luteus extract. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 66: 697-704, 1994.[Medline]
  26. Ahnström G., Edvardsson K. A. Radiation-induced single-strand breaks in DNA determined by rate of alkaline strand separation and hydroxyapatite chromatography: an alternative to velocity sedimentation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 26: 493-497, 1974.
  27. Goodhead D. T. The initial physical damage produced by ionizing radiations. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 56: 623-634, 1989.[Medline]
  28. Roots R., Holley W., Chatterjee A., Irizarry M., Kraft G. The formation of strand breaks in DNA after high-LET irradiation: a comparison of data from in vitro and cellular systems. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 58: 55-69, 1990.[Medline]
  29. Box G. E. P., Cox D. R. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 26: 211-252, 1964.
  30. Draper W., Smith H. Ed. 2 . Applied Regression Analysis, : Wiley New York 1981.
  31. SAS Institute Inc. . Users Guide, Cary, NC 1989.
  32. Raithel H. J. Untersuchung zur Belastung und Beanspruchung von 837 beruflich Nickel-exponierten Personen. Forschungsbericht Nickel. Schriftenreihe des Hauptverbandes der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften e.V., Sankt Augustin 1987.
  33. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. . MAK- und BAT-Werte 1994, Weinheim 1995.
  34. Nakajima M., Takeuchi T., Morimoto K. Determination of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in human cells under oxygen-free conditions. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 787-791, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Ravanat J-L., Turesky R. J., Gremaud E., Trudel L. J., Stadler R. H. Determination of 8-oxoguanine in DNA by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and HPLC-electrochemical detection: overestimation of the background level of the oxidized base by the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry assay. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 8: 1039-1045, 1995.[Medline]
  36. Loft S., Vistisen K., Ewertz M., Tjonneland A., Overvad K., Poulsen H. E. Oxidative DNA damage estimated by 8-hydroxy-guanosine excretion in humans: influence of smoking, gender and body mass index. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 13: 2241-2247, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Wiencke J. K., Thurston S. W., Kelsey K. T., Varkonyi A., Wain J. C., Mark E. J., Christiani D. C. Early age at smoking initiation and tobacco carcinogen DNA damage in the lung. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 91: 614-619, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Wojewodzka M., Kruszewski M., Iwanenko T., Collins A. R., Szumiel I. Lack of adverse effect of smoking habit on DNA strand breakage and base damage, as revealed by the alkaline comet assay. Mutat. Res., 440: 19-25, 1999.[Medline]
  39. Roels H. A., Hoet P., Lison D. Usefulness of biomarkers of exposure to inorganic mercury, lead, or cadmium in controlling occupational and environmental risks of nephrotoxicity. Renal Failure, 21: 251-262, 1999.[Medline]
  40. Krause C., Chutsch M., Henke M., Huber M., Kliem C., Schulz C., Schwarz E. Studienbeschreibung und humanbiologisches Monitoring. Umweltsurvey Bd. I des Instituts für Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene des Bundesgesundheitsamtes, Berlin 1989.
  41. Collins A. R., Dusinska M., Gedik C. M., Stetina R. Oxidative damage to DNA: do we have a reliable biomarker?. Environ. Health Persp., 104(Suppl. 3): 465-469, 1996.
  42. Collins A. R., Duthie S. J., Fillion L., Gedik C. M., Vaughan N., Wood S. G. Oxidative DNA damage in human cells: the influence of antioxidants and DNA repair. Biochem. Soc. Transact., 25: 326-331, 1997.[Medline]
  43. Pflaum M., Will O., Epe B. Determination of steady-state levels of oxidative DNA base modifications in mammalian cells by means of repair endonucleases. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 18: 2225-2231, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Inoue T., Mu Z., Sumikawa K., Adachi K., Okochi T. Effect of physical exercise on the content of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, a typical oxidative DNA damage, in human leucocytes. Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 84: 720-725, 1993.[Medline]
  45. De Kok T. M. C. M., ten Vaarwerk F., Zwingman I., van Maanen J. M. S., Kleinjans J. C. S. Peroxidation of linoleic, arachidonic and oleic acid in relation to the induction of oxidative DNA damage and cytogenetic effects. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 15: 1399-1404, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Takeuchi T., Nakajima M., Ohta Y., Mure K., Takeshita T., Morimoto K. Evaluation of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, typical oxidative DNA damage, in human leucocytes. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 15: 1519-1523, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Collins A. R., Gedik C. M., Olmedilla B., Southon S., Bellizzi M. Oxidative DNA damage measured in human lymphocytes: large differences between sexes and between countries, and correlations with heart disease and mortality. FASEB J., 12: 1397-1400, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Olinski R., Zastawny T. H., Foksinski M., Windorbska W., Jaruga P., Dizdaroglu M. DNA base damage in lymphocytes of cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Cancer Lett., 106: 207-215, 1996.[Medline]
  49. Podmore I. D., Griffiths H. R., Herbert K. E., Mistry N., Mistry P., Lunec J. Vitamin C exhibits pro-oxidant properties. Nature (Lond.), 292: 559 1998.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
Y Yang, X. Jin, C. Yan, Y Tian, J. Tang, and X. Shen
Urinary level of nickel and acute leukaemia in Chinese children
Toxicology and Industrial Health, October 1, 2008; 24(9): 603 - 610.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
P. H. Avogbe, L. Ayi-Fanou, H. Autrup, S. Loft, B. Fayomi, A. Sanni, P. Vinzents, and P. Moller
Ultrafine particulate matter and high-level benzene urban air pollution in relation to oxidative DNA damage
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2005; 26(3): 613 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Mukherjee, L. J. Palmer, J. Y. Kim, D. B. Aeschliman, R. S. Houk, M. A. Woodin, and D. C. Christiani
Smoking Status and Occupational Exposure Affects Oxidative DNA Injury in Boilermakers Exposed to Metal Fume and Residual Oil Fly Ash
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2004; 13(3): 454 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
Comparative analysis of baseline 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in mammalian cell DNA, by different methods in different laboratories: an approach to consensus
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2002; 23(12): 2129 - 2133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
C. M. Gedik, S. P. Boyle, S. G. Wood, N. J. Vaughan, and A. R. Collins
Oxidative stress in humans: validation of biomarkers of DNA damage
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2002; 23(9): 1441 - 1446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merzenich, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jöckel, K.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merzenich, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jöckel, K.-H.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online